Site Logo
Looking for girlfriend > 40 years > Pink and blue boy and girl

Pink and blue boy and girl

Site Logo

Cabinet of Curiosities is a series meant to explain some of the most prevailing mysteries out there. A lot of these "curiosities" involve seriously confusing scientific studies, so we're trying to break it down into layman's terms. Because nobody has time to decipher an entire science experiment when looking for a quick explanation online. Walk into a Babies"R"Us and you might as well walk into two stores sharing the same retail space. On one side, there's the Blue Store, filled with clothes, toys, diapers and pacifiers in various shades of pale blue.

SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: How did pink become a girly color?

Here’s Why it All Changed: Pink Used to be a Boy’s Color & Blue For Girls

Site Logo

Future President Franklin D. Roosevelt in If we were to play a word association game where I said a word and you had to yell out the first color that came to mind, it would probably go something like this: Banana- Yellow; Apple- Red; Boy- Blue; Girl- Pink. We can all understand why yellow and red are associated with bananas and apples, but boys are not blue and girls are not pink.

So why are these colors so very much associated with these genders? Gender identification by color began in the early 20th century in the Western world.

Before this, pink and blue did not hold any gender specific connotations and there are numerous examples of men wearing pink outfits and girls wearing blue; one French author, Xavier de Maistre in his work, A Journey Around My Room published in , even recommended that men choose to paint their rooms pink and white to improve the mood.

Fast-forward to the early 20th century and this began to change. The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink , being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl. In , Time magazine printed a chart highlighting gender-appropriate colors for girls and boys according to leading U.

Why did they care at all? For reasons unknown, this all started to change around the s when clothing manufacturers decided on pink for girls and blue for boys. In fact, in the s, the Sears and Roebuck catalog even went two full years without showing any toddler wearing pink, in stark contrast to a couple decades before. But these gender neutral efforts were undermined with advancements in prenatal testing where parents could find out the gender of their baby before needing to buy clothes and accessories.

So what did people do before this color association? Why white dresses? White was easy to bleach and, at least in the beginning, changing diapers is much easier in dresses than pants. Further, with children growing rapidly, dresses were a bit more practical in terms of not needing to get the sizing as precise. Even beyond the diaper stage, which was discarded much earlier back then see Bonus Fact for more , gender differences were not highlighted until children were much older.

In the early 20th century, as noted, this began to change. Beyond the introduction of more colors and loose guidelines about which color went with which, boys started wearing garb associated with men at a younger and younger age, resulting in a shift away from dresses and a move towards pants. Of course, today for many in the Western world, girls wear pink dresses and boys wear blue pants.

This curious phenomenon is so firmly entrenched that if you tried to dress a two year old boy in a pink dress, regardless of the child perhaps having a traditionally male hair style with male-centric accessories hinting that your toddler is a boy, absolutely no one would think they were looking at a male child until you told them. Pink I thought was associated with girls because of the insides of the vagina lips and their lips and their nipples also being a bit pink, at least with white people.

My daughters are 3 and 7. Their bedrooms are pinky paradises. If people can become snow blind, I might get pink blind. How come? Wo why did girls not have pink stuff in decades and centuries before? Conclusieon: gentlemen may prefer blondes, but girls definitely prefer pink. Now whether they would have preferred pink in the first place, who knows? Pink was for boys and Blue was for girls and then people decided to change it to Blue for boys and Pink for Girls and it has been that way ever since.

Read the original comment he is replying to for clarification. Unless your girls grew up in a missile silo with absolutely no contact with the outside world, I think it is not wise to assume that your color blindness as parents has left your girls a completely blank canvas to build their color preferences.

Yet, in view of what we are reading in this article, the planet or at least our emisphere was full of people that grew up with the opposite color scheme. Do they watch TV? Disney movies? Nursery, daycare, school, cultural influences are everywhere.

So I have to disagree with you. Growing up, I chose most of my clothes, and pink was the last colour I would choose. In fact, my younger brother owns more pink than I do. I find it to be a too overpowering colour.

Even my girl friends can agree that if given the choice between the stereotypical pink or blue, they would go for blue. I hope to see this nonsensical tradition disappear by the time I have kids but i doubt it. I truly believe little girls like pink because from the day they are born they are showered in pink. The hat at the hospital is pink!

All their bedding and stuffed toys are pink. Family buys clothes for them in shades of pink. Your daughters included. Well i mean they have some of the facts right.

There was a reason for the original color blue. As well as why the colors were switched later on. The use of blue originated in what it commonly referred to as ancient times like egypt where blue was thought to be able to ward off evil spirits because it represented the heavens. So young boys in many cultures were dressed in blue because their survival was viewed as more important. Later as time progressed children were often simply dressed in white but due to messes etc, pastel colors were brought in during the mid 19th century.

Nor marketing companies defined pink as appropriate for boys and blue for girls. This was because it was arbitrarily decided that pink was more masculine. So the color was given to girls and blue to boys which has been continually pushed by marketers since. Nobody bats a thousand. Pretty sure that pinks and oranges are the colours for boys in India today.

A few random facts on apparel—1 In AD , Emperor Theodosius I of Rome exiled men in pants as political subversives and seized their property. And there we have it. She was wearing pants to her job at a war factory. However, women were expected to change into pants inside so as to not offend the intolerant, psychiatrically pandered public, and to change back out of pants before leaving. At that point, Federal administrators cracked down on the Chicago City Council to amend its stupid city ordinance, because it was deemed that the war effort was more important than giving assent to idiotic psychiatric dogma.

There are hardly any female intrinsic garments besides bras. It certainly makes sense for a small child of any gender to wear a dress. Can you imagine the laundry you would have to hand wash when the cloth diaper leaked if they wore pants?! The color association seems odd to me anyhow. I never really cared for pink growing up either. Toys are toys, colors are colors, and clothes are clothes in my family. Just a theory …what do you reckon?

About potty training: my four younger siblings and I were all potty trained day AND night time before we were a year old. My mother started training us when we started standing up. As one year olds, all of us were able to walk and did not need diapers any more.

As the article says, most humans like blue and do not like pink, regardless of gender. One of the other reasons that I learned in Religious Studies, and there is some debate that it is apocryphal, is that there is the association of red with Jesus, think of the red cross on the shields of the crusaders , and blue with Mary, who is most often pictured wearing blue and white.

NO you notice the time frame of those boys dressed up like girls, this is right after the Civil War most women were bat sht crazy at that time and mothers were way to protective of their boys. I hate it when a liberal tries to tie in inaccuracies with history. Way too protective of their boys? Theirs boys wielding axes at 8 and 9? Going to war at 14? And to call women of that time bat shit crazy is just ignorant and downright stupidity. And before you say more stupid shit, yes, right after the civil war there were other conflicts.

During the period in question of course boys and girls were referred to as different sexes, not genders. The article would have articulated its point better if it had referred to the colour conventions as pertaining to gender, rather than the boys and girls themselves.

During the Third Reich the Panzer unit collar insignia had pink piping. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

A Young boy in Enjoy this article? Articles Featured Facts Misc. Sara November 1, am. White boys have pink penises and pink lips as well. Emma October 3, pm. However they can get blue balls hahah. Jessica February 13, pm. Boys also have pink nipples.

Pink Girl, Blue Boy

Earlier, we discussed the theory that the "pink is for girls, blue is for boys" binary is foisted on children by society. In baby photos from the late s, male and female tots wear frilly white dresses — so how did pink onesies with "Princess" emblazoned on the butt infiltrate American girls' wardrobes? According to Smithsonian. For centuries, all children had worn practical white dresses, which could easily be pulled up to change diapers, and bleached when said diapers inevitably exploded. Pastel baby clothes were introduced in the midth century, but according to University of Maryland historian Jo B.

In fiction, and sometimes in Real Life , we tend to differentiate between "girly colors" and boyish ones. It is clearer with babies, when we are prone to see girls dressed in pink and boys in light blue. Prior to the industrial revolution and the development of synthetic dyes, colors were limited and the high costs rarely spent on children's clothing outside the upper classes.

Since the 19th century, the colors pink and blue have been used as gender signifiers, particularly for infants and young children. The current tradition in the United States and an unknown number of other countries is "pink for girls, blue for boys". Prior to , two conflicting traditions coexisted in the U. This was noted by Paoletti , [2] , [3] [1]. Since the s, Paoletti's research has been misinterpreted and has evolved into an urban legend: that there was a full reversal in , prior to which the only tradition observed was the opposite of the current one.

Cabinet of Curiosities: Why Baby Boys Wear Blue and Baby Girls Wear Pink

Blue is for boys and pink is for girls, we're told. But do these gender norms reflect some inherent biological difference between the sexes, or are they culturally constructed? It depends on whom you ask. Decades of research by University of Maryland historian Jo Paoletti suggests that up until the s, chaos reigned when it came to the colors of baby paraphernalia. Because the pink-for-a-girl, blue-for-a-boy social norms only set in during the 20th century in the United States, they cannot possibly stem from any evolved differences between boys' and girls' favorite colors , Paoletti has argued. Baby books, new baby announcements and cards, gift lists and newspaper articles from the early s indicate that pink was just as likely to be associated with boy babies as with girl babies. For example, the June issue of the Infant's Department, a trade magazine for baby clothes manufacturers, said: "There has been a great diversity of opinion on this subject, but the generally accepted rule is pink for the boy and blue for the girl.

List of historical sources for pink and blue as gender signifiers

Five week old twins newborn wearing pink and blue — boy or girl? To understand this concept, we have to go back to a time before colors were associated with gender at all. As revealed by Jo B. Paoletti, a professor at the University of Maryland and author of Pink and Blue: Telling the Boys from the Girls in America , there was once a time well before pink and blue were used to distinguish between boys and girls at all.

Future President Franklin D. Roosevelt in


Why Is Pink for Girls and Blue for Boys?



When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?


Oct 17, - The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more.








Comments: 0
  1. No comments yet.

Thanks! Your comment will appear after verification.
Add a comment

© 2020 Online - Advisor on specific issues.